<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>webmarketing4you &#187; Rupert Murdoch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au/tag/rupert-murdoch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 07:06:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rupert Murdoch Interview: We Will Block Google</title>
		<link>http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au/2009/11/11/rupert-murchoch-interview-we-will-block-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au/2009/11/11/rupert-murchoch-interview-we-will-block-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmarketing4you</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newscorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
An interview by Australian Sky News reporter, David Speers, has shed even more light on Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s plans to move away from free content to a pay-for-content model. He now intends to possibly stick it to Google by preventing them from indexing Newscorp content.
To date the pay for content strategy has been met with mixed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webmarketing4you.com.au%2F2009%2F11%2F11%2Frupert-murchoch-interview-we-will-block-google%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.webmarketing4you.com.au%2F2009%2F11%2F11%2Frupert-murchoch-interview-we-will-block-google%2F&amp;source=wm4you&amp;style=normal&amp;service=bit.ly" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>An interview by Australian Sky News reporter, David Speers, has shed even more light on Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s plans to move away from free content to a pay-for-content model. He now intends to possibly stick it to Google by preventing them from indexing Newscorp content.</p>
<p>To date the pay for content strategy has been met with mixed reviews. <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/11/04/abcs-mark-scott-takes-on-the-world-breaking-news/" target="_blank">Mark Scott</a> of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) was one of the first heavyweights in Australia to hit out at his plans.</p>
<p>Now we have further revelations from Mr Murdoch suggesting they may block Google completely.</p>
<p>As an example, the Wall Street Journal currently appears in Google SERPs and Google News, however when you click on a WSJ link you are taken to the page which offers a short snippet or summary of the article. If you want to continue reading you must be a paying subscriber.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M7GkJqRv3BI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M7GkJqRv3BI&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
<p>If Rupert Murdoch continues with his current plans and Newscorp does block Google, by raising the &#8220;barrier to the ceiling&#8221;, stories from the WSJ or any other Newscorp publication will be blocked. . . depending on what your thoughts are of their journalism you may see it as a good thing.</p>
<p>So how will this play out? For two opposing view points head over to the <a href="http://blogmaverick.com/2009/11/09/rupert-murdoch-to-block-google-smart-twitter-has-changed-it-all/" target="_blank">Blog Maverick</a> who believe Rupert Murdoch is right. On the other hand you have <a href="http://www.localseoguide.com/should-rupert-murdoch-give-google-the-noindex-finger/" target="_blank">Andrew Shortland</a> suggesting Rupert Murdoch will be the equivalent of &#8220;Howard Stern Without The Lesbians&#8221;.</p>
<p>My take, it is a very calculated move by Rupert Murdoch. . . and if it works we will see a flood of media powerhouses and businesses moving towards paid content and pay-per-use strategies. If it doesn&#8217;t he always has TV?</p>
<p>One final thought. It does seem Newscorp has been beaten at its own game, for the time being?</p>
<p><a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/09/the-platform-vs-the-eyeballs.html" target="_blank">Seth Godin</a> recently suggested how media companies, such as newspapers, built audiences and then businesses and brands rented their audiences.</p>
<p>In today&#8217;s online world the playing field has shifted. Google has built the platform and they are renting their audience back to the newspapers. Newscorp no longer owns the platform, they&#8217;re renting eyeballs as Seth would say. Now it seems a time has come as Mr Murdoch wants to stop renting and move back to a position of owning the platform &#8212; and build a loyal customer base in the process.</p>
<p>Only time will tell if Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s strategy is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webmarketing4you.com.au/2009/11/11/rupert-murchoch-interview-we-will-block-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
